🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where African descendants are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.